Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the updraftplus domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/tpfpnews/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114
Time To Name The Clients: JPMorgan Flagged Over $1 Billion In Suspicious Epstein Transfers – The Patriots Free Press

Time To Name The Clients: JPMorgan Flagged Over $1 Billion In Suspicious Epstein Transfers

by Zero Hedge 9/2/2023

www.infowars.com 


JPMorgan flagged over $1 billion in suspicious transactions linked to deceased pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, which the bank reported to the US government, the US Virgin Islands has claimed in its lawsuit against the bank.


ā€œJPMorgan was a full-service bank for Jeffrey Epsteinā€™s sex trafficking,ā€ said Mimi Liu, an attorney for the USVI, which says the enormous sum bolsters key allegations in their legal action against the bank, which they say knowingly benefited from Epsteinā€™s wrongdoing, Bloomberg reports, noting that this is the first time in the case that the ā€˜sheer volume of Epsteinā€™s financial activity at JPMorgan over a 16-year period has been disclosed.ā€™

The suspicious activity was detailed in a 2019 filing to the US Department of Treasury, a USVI attorney told a federal court in Manhattan on Thursday. The filing was made after Epstein died in a Manhattan jail cell a month after his arrest on sex trafficking charges. Epstein had been with the bank from the late 1990s through 2013, when they finally cut ties with him.


Epstein notoriously trafficked some of his victims to a private island in the USVI.

JPMorgan denies that it let Epsteinā€™s activities slide, and says it reported around 150 cash transactions to a federal regulator between 2002 and 2013.


Last month, the USVI told the judge in the case that the bank facilitated over $1.1 million in payments from Jeffrey Epstein to ā€œgirls or women,ā€ many of whom had Eastern European surnames.


Over $320,000 of the payments were made to ā€œnumerous individuals for whom JPMorgan had no previously identified payments,ā€ Singer wrote, accusing the bank of failing to disclose the payments until after the end of discovery ā€“ the period in which parties in a lawsuit exchange evidence.


The bank claims thatā€™s irrelevant, because the USVI doesnā€™t have legal standing to claim JPMorgan obstructed a trafficking investigation because it wasnā€™t a victim.

That said, Liu is urging the judge in the case to decide various claims in the USVIā€™s favor without a trial.


ā€œThe only reason that JPMorgan after 16 years reported the $1 billion in suspicious transactions was because he was arrested and then he was dead,ā€ she said.


JPMorgan claims they had no idea what Epstein was up to ā€“ pointing to depositions from current and former employees who say they had no knowledge of the trafficking.

ā€œThere is hotly disputed testimony and evidence,ā€ said Feliia Ellsworth, an attorney for the bank.


The USVI is seeking at least $190 million from JPMorgan.


The case is USVI v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, 22-cv-10904-UA, US District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).